| General Information |
Project/Program |
Project |
| Project Name |
EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME |
| Duration |
2008-2010 |
| Donor |
etc |
| Implementiong Organization |
N.A. |
| Sector and/or Subsector Classification |
Child Protection |
| Region |
N.A. |
| Financing |
N.A. |
| Analytical Information |
Stakeholders |
CCWC Commune Committee for Women and Children
COs Country Offices
EAPRO East Asia and Pacific Regional office
FGD Focus Group Discussions
FPWC Focal Point for Women and Children
GoN Government of the Netherlands
HQ Headquarters
MDAs Ministries, Departments, and Agencies
MOH Ministry of Health
MOEYS Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports
MOI Ministry of the Interior
MOSVY Ministry of Social Affairs, Veterans, and Youth Rehabilitation
MOWA Ministry of Women’s Affairs
MSG Mother Support Group
NGO Nongovernmental Organization
OECD Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development
RGC Royal Government of Cambodia
ROs Regional Offices
SPS State Preschools
UIS UNESCO Institute for Statistics
UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
US United States |
| Cross-cutting Issue |
Environment |
Referring from the report, there is a :"lack of data on pre-primary enrollment by income group and disability status limit capacity to monitor access for disadvantaged and marginalized populations and target them for enrollment." |
| Gender |
No gender related issue mentioned in the evaluation report |
| Impact Analysis |
According to the final report, there is an "appropriateness and Alignment with National Goals and Priorities" for example, with the National Policy on Early Childhood Care Development (ECCD), adopted in February 2010; the National Strategic Development Plan Update for 2009-2013; the Education for All National Plan for 2003-2015; and others. |
| Effectiveness |
Ownership/Partnership |
Evaluation |
The final report states, "Coordination related to ECD activities appears to occur reliably among UNICEF sections." |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Policy Coherence/Harmonization |
Evaluation |
Referring from the final report, "We saw very little evidence of coordination on planning or implementation of ECD services across national ministries or local-level agencies. At the national level, ministries have not engaged in joint planning for ECD. Similarly, it does not appear that services are co-located or coordinated." |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Evaluation Framework |
Evaluation |
The project has states the following: The evaluation team employed two main qualitative evaluation methods in analyzing case study data: (1) thematic framing and (2) triangulation. Weaknesses in monitoring and technical assistance affect efforts at quality improvement. |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Alignment/Composition of Finance |
Evaluation |
The report states the sustainability is a concern for the success of the project. |
| Rating |
3/5 |
| Other Remarks |
|
