| General Information |
Project/Program |
Project |
| Project Name |
3 Projects of the National Geodetic Control Point Installation in Cambodia (NGCPIP) |
| Duration |
First Phase: 2003.Dec - 2005. Jan.
Second Phase: 2005. Dec - 2006. Dec.
Third Phase: 2007. Dec. - 2009. Dec. |
| Donor |
Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) |
| Implementiong Organization |
Ministry of Land Management, Urban Planning, and Construction. |
| Sector and/or Subsector Classification |
Infrastructure |
| Region |
First Phase: Kampong Cham Province
Second Phase: Pursat and Koh Kong
Third Phase: All across Cambodia |
| Financing |
First Phase: 1 million USD
Second Phase: 1.20 million USD
Third Phase: 2.50 million USD |
| Analytical Information |
Stakeholders |
Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA), Ministry of Land Management, Urban Planning, and Construction (MLMUPC), Canadian Development International Agency(CIDA), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Royal University of Agriculture, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Samboo Engineering |
| Cross-cutting Issue |
Environment |
In evaluating whether consideration was given to the environment upon implementation of NGCPIP, consideration was deemed appropriate as a result of interviews with project participants and personnel from the participating company (Samboo Engineering) along with the project report-review. |
| Gender |
Gender issue has not been mentioned in this ex-poxt evaluation report. |
| Impact Analysis |
Cambodia's national geodetic control points were installed based on the Hanoi System from 1902 to 1950, but the existing geodetic and cadastral data were almost destroyed or lost due to civil wars (85%). In this context, the installation of national geodetic criteria is very important for land management and development, becoming an urgent issue. Cambodia is currently drawing up the Geodetic Survey Act (draft) following NGCPIP, and the revision of the National Policy on Spatial Planning (enacted in April 2011) and the Act on Land Management, Urban Planning, and Construction (enacted in 1994) is underway. All these prove that their linkage with Cambodia's geodetic survey policies is high. |
| Effectiveness |
Ownership/Partnership |
Evaluation |
The site office was located near Cambodia's Geography Department, and they frequently net and maintained smooth communication. Since Cambodia's engineers and project participating company's engineers stayed in the same accommodation, communication was carried out smoothly. |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Policy Coherence/Harmonization |
Evaluation |
The ex-post evaluation report states that the Cambodian Geography Department Director and project head met two or three times a week to consult on work, and a close cooperation relationship was made with related personnel in the project regions. Based on this, the report considered the effeciency of the project was high, especially in communication. |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Evaluation Framework |
Evaluation |
The evaluation consisted of literature,data collection, questionnaire, and in-depth analysis, And the on-site visit study for data collection was conducted from July 10 to 21 of 2011 (12 days and 11 nights). More details in interviewees, on-site study trip schedule and questionnaires were provided in the ex-post evaluation report. |
| Rating |
3/5 |
| Alignment/Composition of Finance |
Evaluation |
For sustainability of the project, the ex-post evaluation report says that the commitment of the Cambodian government to preserve the survey marks can be confirmed through the statutory Land Law, and that Cambodia's institutional efforts for geodetic control points maintenance/repair are considered to be made simultaneously. The report took this one of the gronds to prove satisfactory sustainability of the project. |
| Rating |
3/5 |
| Other Remarks |
The ex-post evaluation report states that although the project began in 2003, it was completed in 2009; as such there is a limistation in analysing the impacts and sustainability of the project because the project duration was not that long. |
