| General Information |
Project/Program |
Project |
| Project Name |
Food Aid for Recovery and Rehabilitation |
| Duration |
Temporary project in 1999 |
| Donor |
World Food Programme (WFP) |
| Implementiong Organization |
All Ministries and the Government |
| Sector and/or Subsector Classification |
Emergency |
| Region |
communes in 22 of 23 provinces |
| Financing |
N.I. |
| Analytical Information |
Stakeholders |
Cambodian Red Cross, Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit (German Agency for Technical
Cooperation), Lutheran World Federation, Ministry of Rural Development, Non-governmental organization, Provincial Department of Rural Development, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Children's Fund, Village Development Committee, United Nations World Food Programme |
| Cross-cutting Issue |
Environment |
There is no information regarding environment in the evaluation report. |
| Gender |
There is no information regarding gender in the evaluation report. |
| Impact Analysis |
This programme was not created to align a certain country policy, but as a relief and emergency program to help poverty alleviation by providing community rehabilitation and recovery components. In particular, according to the report, the programme's objectives are "(a) build and rehabilitate essential assets, facilitate reconciliation and promote self-reliance among the poor; (b) contribute to improving the quality of life; (c) provide immediate relief from hunger among specific groups temporarily unable to meet their basic food needs." |
| Effectiveness |
Ownership/Partnership |
Evaluation |
As this is a relief and emergency project, the programme itself is short and thus, the evaluation report does not focus on the pillars of the Paris Declaration. |
| Rating |
N.A. |
| Policy Coherence/Harmonization |
Evaluation |
As this is a relief and emergency project, the programme itself is short and thus, the evaluation report does not focus on the pillars of the Paris Declaration. |
| Rating |
N.A. |
| Evaluation Framework |
Evaluation |
Referring from the report, the evaluation framework is as follows: A full TOR for the mission is attached (Appendix 1). In brief, the evaluation sought to clarify the utility of the PRRO as a new programme category, ensuring the effective utilization of resources made available to achieve stated objectives. Key issues examined were: (i) transition from relief through recover and rehabilitation; (ii) facilitation of settlement through food aid; (iii) effectiveness of FFW schemes; (iv) adequacy of targeting and monitoring, and (v) the coherence and balance of the programmatic focus as it feeds into the next phase. Methods included:· a review of documents provided by HQ, the CO and implementing partners
· a review and in-country presentation of the additional commissioned technical reports
· extensive consultation with CO staff, implementing partners and government representatives
· group and individual interviews held with project beneficiaries on-site. Also non-beneficiaries in villages adjoining project sites. |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Alignment/Composition of Finance |
Evaluation |
As this is a relief and emergency project, the programme itself is short and thus, the evaluation report does not focus on the pillars of the Paris Declaration. According to the report, "administrative and finance review was not part of the mission’s terms of reference." |
| Rating |
N.A. |
| Other Remarks |
|
