| General Information |
Project/Program |
Project |
| Project Name |
WFP Cambodia School Feeding |
| Duration |
2000-2010 |
| Donor |
World Food Programme (WFP) |
| Implementiong Organization |
Ministry of Education Sports and Youth |
| Sector and/or Subsector Classification |
Education |
| Region |
Please check the WFP's evaluation report. |
| Financing |
N.I. |
| Analytical Information |
Stakeholders |
non-governmental organisations (NGO), United Nations Children‟s Fund (UNICEF), World Food Prgramme, Child-Friendly School (CFS) , ADB Asian Development Bank, Council for Agricultural and Rural Development, Independent Cambodian Development Policy Research Institute, Child-Friendly School, Country Office, International Food Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Education Sports and Youth, National Institute of Statistics, Office of Evaluation (WFP), technical working groups, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Children‟s Fund, World Food Programme, World Health Organization, Royal Governmnet of Cambodia |
| Cross-cutting Issue |
Environment |
There is no information regarding environment in the evaluation report. |
| Gender |
There is no information regarding gender in the evaluation report. |
| Impact Analysis |
According to the report, the project aligns with the WFP Strategic Plan and 2009 School Feeding Policy, National Strategic Development Plan (2006-2010), National Programme for Household Food Security and Poverty Reduction (2007-2011), National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) 2010, FP‟s Strategic Objective (SO) 4 – Reduce Chronic Hunger and Undernutrition, and WFP‟s School Feeding Policy, approved by the Executive Board in November 2009. |
| Effectiveness |
Ownership/Partnership |
Evaluation |
According to the report, "based on high community involvement (contribution and control) and explicit government commitment (strategic and financial)." In addition, "partnership with UNICEF in implementing Child Friendly School (which are similar to the Essential Package) are normally considered to be an enabling factor for improved schooling" however, "the number of partners decreased in the period being evaluated, and focus has been put on more strategic partners." |
| Rating |
4/5 |
| Policy Coherence/Harmonization |
Evaluation |
There is no information regarding harmonization nor policy coherence in the evaluation report. |
| Rating |
N.A. |
| Evaluation Framework |
Evaluation |
According to the report, the evaluation framework is as follows: "this impact evaluation takes a mixed methods approach, which makes optimum use of evaluation resources and possibilities to support evaluative assessments and show developments over time in order to provide evidence for well-informed decision making in as timely a manner as possible. In the inception phase the evaluation team will develop an evaluation matrix that expands the key questions and articulates sub-questions, verifiable indicators to respond to these, and means of verification/data collection." |
| Rating |
3/5 |
| Alignment/Composition of Finance |
Evaluation |
There is no information regarding alignment and composition of finance in the evaluation report. |
| Rating |
N.A. |
| Other Remarks |
|
